What “Minimum-Risk” Means on a Bug Repellent Label
The short answer
There’s no EPA registration number on a tube of Notch. People ask about that, and they should. It isn’t a gap. It’s a different path to the shelf, with its own rules, and once you know them you can read any repellent label in about a minute.
The first thing to know: to the EPA, a pesticide is anything meant to repel, kill or control pests. That includes the lotion you rub on your arms before dinner on the patio, so every repellent sold in the U.S. falls under the federal pesticide law, FIFRA.
“Geraniol 5%” tells you exactly what’s doing the work and how much of it there is. “Proprietary essential oil blend” tells you nothing. Plant actives only work above a certain strength, so the number matters as much as the name.
If it’s there, the product went through EPA registration. Registered actives include DEET, picaridin, IR3535 and oil of lemon eucalyptus.
If it isn’t there, the product is claiming the minimum-risk exemption, FIFRA 25(b). The EPA keeps short lists of active and inactive ingredients it considers to pose minimum risk, mostly plant oils and plant-derived compounds like geraniol, lemongrass oil, citronella oil and peppermint oil. A product made only from listed ingredients, and labeled to the rules, is exempt from federal registration.1 Those rules say the label must:1
Federal exemption isn’t the whole story, either. Many states require minimum-risk products to register with them before they can be sold there.1
Geraniol research on BugRepellent.GuideCitronella oil research on BugRepellent.Guide
BugRepellent.Guide is a repellent research site run by the Notch team.
The directions tell you how much to use and how often to reapply. The promises tell you whether the brand knows the rules. Disease claims or “chemical-free” on a product with no EPA Reg. No. are red flags.
That’s why you’ll see us talk about repelling mosquitoes and ticks, never about diseases. It’s not an oversight. It’s the rule for minimum-risk repellents.
The exemption only covers products that meet every condition. A repellent that misses even one isn’t minimum-risk, and if it isn’t registered with the EPA either, it can’t legally be sold. The EPA itself warns that there are products on the market that neither qualify for the exemption nor are registered.2
Researching labels for BugRepellent.Guide, we’ve seen the same problems come up again and again in products sold as natural repellents:
This matters because the rules are what make a minimum-risk label something you can rely on. Skip them and you can’t tell which active is on your skin, how much, or whether there’s enough to do anything. Geraniol, for example, needs to be around 5%; an undisclosed amount can mean minutes of protection instead of an hour. And every product that overpromises makes it harder to trust the plant-based repellents that do the work.
No. Minimum-risk describes what goes into a product, not how well it performs. Two repellents can both be minimum-risk and work very differently, because the ingredient and its strength make all the difference. Geraniol at 5% is one of the best-studied plant-based options, while some popular oils wear off in minutes. That’s the whole reason we built Nourish + Defend the way we did: a minimum-risk lotion, 5% geraniol, every ingredient on the tube.
Want to go deeper? Here’s which natural repellents actually work, and how BugRepellent.Guide scores every product, ours included, by the same published rules.
No. Minimum-risk products are exempt from registration, so they aren’t registered or approved by the EPA, and their labels shouldn’t suggest otherwise. They qualify for the exemption because of the ingredients they use.
No. A product only qualifies if every active and inactive ingredient is on the EPA’s lists and the label follows the rules, including naming each active with its percentage. Products that use other actives, like oil of lemon eucalyptus, need an EPA registration number instead.